Propaganda and Foreign Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Propaganda and Foreign Policy - Essay ExampleAccording to Noam Chomsky (1999), within the reigning social order, the general public must go forward an object of manipulation, not a participant in thought, debate and decision (Noam Chomsky, 1999, p.131). Propaganda is also defined as, Propaganda is not the same as advertising or art. art today is preoccupied with abstract ideas advertising tries to get you to buy something. Propaganda, on the other hand, is interested in making you believe something. It is the stronger societal force one time you start believing in an idea or ideology you will buy anything metaphorical or literal it tries to sell you. Once the public was panicked into believing Iraq was trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction, they didnt seem to mind that they were being fed lies over and over. Un virtues and misleading statements were quickly accepted as backup and justification for a particular point of view, even when proven false. Propaganda is that st rong (MLC, 2012, p.1). This paper will examine this statement in determining the views of society with citation to the roles played by the elites and the media. The relationship between the mass media and propaganda is indeed complex and by no means a linear process. The paper will distribute whether the mass media reflects the ruling elite ideology and whether it is inevitable. An analysis will be made of how development in communications impacts propaganda and whether such developments make propaganda more or less important and effective. An examination will also be made of whether instant communication options such as satellite TV provide the truth concerning events in the context of representing objective reality or mediating the reality. Harold Lasswell, who was a sociologist, had written after the end of the First World War that there was a trenchant relationship amongst the war and propaganda. He was of the opinion that moist Americans had just started learning at that tim e, although not a century later A new and subtler pawn must weld thousands and even millions of human beings into one amalgamated mass of hate will and hope. A new will must burn come out of the canker of dissent and temper the steel of bellicose enthusiasm. The name of this new hammer and anvil of social solidarity is propaganda. Talk must take the place of performance print must supply the dance. War dances live in literature, and at the fringes of modern earth war propaganda breathes and fumes in the capitals and provinces of the world. Another example is of what happened, today after the end of the Second World War Germany had become an important economic and political global resource for the on the wholeied nations, particularly the US and the USSR. It is ameliorate to say in this context that all battles are fought on two fronts the war front and peoples minds, through propaganda. It is thus true that the prissy people and the bad people can be held guilty of misguiding their citizens through fabricated, inaccurate, subjective and exaggerated news and information, with the prime objective of receiving support and a vox populi of legitimacy. Propaganda serves well in rallying citizens for a given cause but it is mostly done through exaggeration and misrepresentation relative to the given issues in order to get peoples approval and support (Hale, 1975). Propaganda cannot be said to be new in war. It has always been a part of all conflicts and is considered a means that is used by governments for demoralizing their enemies and mobilizing their nations. It is evident that while fighting a war, there is a need for the creation and maintenance of sentiments amongst soldiers and